\relax 
\providecommand\hyper@newdestlabel[2]{}
\providecommand\HyperFirstAtBeginDocument{\AtBeginDocument}
\HyperFirstAtBeginDocument{\ifx\hyper@anchor\@undefined
\global\let\oldcontentsline\contentsline
\gdef\contentsline#1#2#3#4{\oldcontentsline{#1}{#2}{#3}}
\global\let\oldnewlabel\newlabel
\gdef\newlabel#1#2{\newlabelxx{#1}#2}
\gdef\newlabelxx#1#2#3#4#5#6{\oldnewlabel{#1}{{#2}{#3}}}
\AtEndDocument{\ifx\hyper@anchor\@undefined
\let\contentsline\oldcontentsline
\let\newlabel\oldnewlabel
\fi}
\fi}
\global\let\hyper@last\relax 
\gdef\HyperFirstAtBeginDocument#1{#1}
\providecommand*\HyPL@Entry[1]{}
\bibstyle{unsrt}
\bibdata{references/reference}
\bibcite{Metropolis:1987}{1}
\bibcite{GALTON1890}{2}
\bibcite{INTEL}{3}
\bibcite{gude1985}{4}
\bibcite{figotin2004random}{5}
\bibcite{Stipcevic:07}{6}
\bibcite{kwiat:09}{7}
\bibcite{Fuerst2010}{8}
\bibcite{Wayne:10}{9}
\bibcite{Wahl2011}{10}
\bibcite{Nie2014}{11}
\bibcite{Ren2011}{12}
\bibcite{Frauchiger2013}{13}
\bibcite{Williams2010}{14}
\bibcite{Kanter2009}{15}
\bibcite{Sanguinetti2014}{16}
\bibcite{Nie2015}{17}
\bibcite{Qi2010}{18}
\bibcite{Xu2012}{19}
\bibcite{Abellan2014}{20}
\bibcite{PhysRevLett.115.250403}{21}
\bibcite{Yuan2014}{22}
\bibcite{Zhou2015}{23}
\bibcite{Jofre2011}{24}
\HyPL@Entry{0<</S/D>>}
\bibcite{Gabriel2010}{25}
\bibcite{Syed2011}{26}
\bibcite{Shen2010}{27}
\bibcite{Shi2016}{28}
\bibcite{Krawczyk1994}{29}
\bibcite{NISTtestsuite}{30}
\bibcite{dieharder}{31}
\citation{Metropolis:1987}
\citation{GALTON1890,INTEL}
\citation{gude1985,figotin2004random}
\citation{Stipcevic:07,kwiat:09,Fuerst2010,Wayne:10,Wahl2011,Nie2014,Ren2011}
\citation{Frauchiger2013}
\citation{Williams2010}
\citation{Kanter2009,Sanguinetti2014}
\citation{Nie2015,Qi2010,Xu2012,Abellan2014,PhysRevLett.115.250403,Yuan2014,Zhou2015,Jofre2011}
\citation{Gabriel2010,Syed2011,Shen2010,Shi2016}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {1}Introduction}{2}{section.1}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {2}Optical homodyne measurement by wavefront splitting}{3}{section.2}}
\newlabel{eq:beam_splitter_matrix}{{1}{3}{Optical homodyne measurement by wavefront splitting}{equation.2.1}{}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {1}{\ignorespaces Splitting mechanisms of the two different implementations. A conventional balanced homodyne detection scheme (a) relies on the beam splitter matrix relation between the input modes $a$, $b$ and the output modes $c$, $d$. In the wavefront-splitting implementation (b), this is replaced by spatially splitting the elliptical transverse mode of a laser beam.}}{3}{figure.1}}
\newlabel{fig:splitting}{{1}{3}{Splitting mechanisms of the two different implementations. A conventional balanced homodyne detection scheme (a) relies on the beam splitter matrix relation between the input modes $a$, $b$ and the output modes $c$, $d$. In the wavefront-splitting implementation (b), this is replaced by spatially splitting the elliptical transverse mode of a laser beam}{figure.1}{}}
\newlabel{eq:elliptical}{{2}{3}{Optical homodyne measurement by wavefront splitting}{equation.2.2}{}}
\citation{Gabriel2010,Syed2011,Shen2010,Shi2016}
\newlabel{eq:half_elliptical}{{3}{4}{Optical homodyne measurement by wavefront splitting}{equation.2.3}{}}
\newlabel{eq:mixing}{{4}{4}{Optical homodyne measurement by wavefront splitting}{equation.2.4}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {3}Implementation}{4}{section.3}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {2}{\ignorespaces Amplified noise levels measured into a resolution bandwidth $B = 60$ kHz. The red trace is the amplified photocurrent difference $i_1 - i_2$, with equal optical power impinging on both photodiodes. The blue trace corresponds to the electronic noise which is measured without any optical input.}}{4}{figure.2}}
\newlabel{fig:schematic}{{2}{4}{Amplified noise levels measured into a resolution bandwidth $B = 60$ kHz. The red trace is the amplified photocurrent difference $i_1 - i_2$, with equal optical power impinging on both photodiodes. The blue trace corresponds to the electronic noise which is measured without any optical input}{figure.2}{}}
\citation{Shi2016}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3}{\ignorespaces Amplified noise levels measured into a resolution bandwidth $B = 100$ kHz. The red trace is the amplified photocurrent difference $i_1 - i_2$, with equal optical power impinging on both photodiodes. The blue trace corresponds to the electronic noise which is measured without any optical input.}}{5}{figure.3}}
\newlabel{fig:spectrum}{{3}{5}{Amplified noise levels measured into a resolution bandwidth $B = 100$ kHz. The red trace is the amplified photocurrent difference $i_1 - i_2$, with equal optical power impinging on both photodiodes. The blue trace corresponds to the electronic noise which is measured without any optical input}{figure.3}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {4}Entropy estimation and randomness extraction}{5}{section.4}}
\citation{Shi2016}
\citation{Krawczyk1994}
\citation{NISTtestsuite}
\citation{dieharder}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {4}{\ignorespaces Autocorrelation of the total noise signal sampled at 200\tmspace  +\thinmuskip {.1667em}MHz, computed over $10^7$ samples (solid line), compared with the $2\sigma $ confidence level (dashed line).}}{6}{figure.4}}
\newlabel{fig:autocorrelation}{{4}{6}{Autocorrelation of the total noise signal sampled at 200\,MHz, computed over $10^7$ samples (solid line), compared with the $2\sigma $ confidence level (dashed line)}{figure.4}{}}
\newlabel{eq:conditional}{{5}{6}{Entropy estimation and randomness extraction}{equation.4.5}{}}
\newlabel{eq:shannon}{{6}{6}{Entropy estimation and randomness extraction}{equation.4.6}{}}
\newlabel{eq:min_entropy}{{7}{6}{Entropy estimation and randomness extraction}{equation.4.7}{}}
\citation{Nie2015,Williams2010,Xu2012}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {5}{\ignorespaces Probability distribution of the measured total noise with variance ${{\sigma }_t}^2$ (a), electronic noise with variance ${{\sigma }_e}^2$ (b), and the estimated quantum noise with variance ${{\sigma }_q}^2$ (c). The filled areas in (a), (b) show the actual measurements over $10^7$ samples, the solid lines fit to Gaussian distributions.}}{7}{figure.5}}
\newlabel{fig:distribution}{{5}{7}{Probability distribution of the measured total noise with variance ${{\sigma }_t}^2$ (a), electronic noise with variance ${{\sigma }_e}^2$ (b), and the estimated quantum noise with variance ${{\sigma }_q}^2$ (c). The filled areas in (a), (b) show the actual measurements over $10^7$ samples, the solid lines fit to Gaussian distributions}{figure.5}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {5}Performance}{7}{section.5}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {6}Conclusion}{7}{section.6}}